![]() Note the results are different from AP-105 (300 Mbits/sec) to AP-335 (600 Mbits/sec) Install Ubuntu iperf and test result from three CAPs. Ubuntu install iperf and test results from CAP The benefits: accurate results, instant feedback (no need to run the command “show perf-test reports” to get the test results). Instead of running iperf server from local controller I install and run iperf2 server on a physical Ubuntu. Check my post on how to setup and monitor Mesh wireless backhaul with PRTG:įor CAP backhaul, since AOS8 the new command perf-test has been introduced. ![]() For instance, at one site a plumber/low-voltage contractor ran and terminated network cables, APs are online, cables were running way over 300 feet to AP, terrible experience for users (BTW my avatar was “inspired” by this.)Īfter this incident, I used the Remote Mesh solution for most of my remote locations. ![]() There are multiple incidents because cables were not pulled or terminated correctly. I have supported many remote sites where I have no control of the local contractor for cabling. As the wireless world moves to multi-gigabit wireless infrastructure, clients expect fast Wi-Fi but there are not much discussions about the bottleneck of wired backhauls for CAP or wireless backhaul for Remote Mesh AP where clients connect “gig” to wireless but the throughputs are slow in “meg” because invisible backhauls’ problems.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |